CleanRanking
Decision Intelligence
When Everything Feels Important Discover what actually is...
Turn uncertainty, debate, or gut feeling into a clear, defensible order — in minutes.
Clear Decisions. Quickly. Get Started.
How it works
For Individuals, Teams or Groups - Live Or At Your Own Pace.
Add your choices
1
Strategies, priorities, candidates — anything you need to rank.
Compare two at a time
2
Two options. One Click. Keep repeating until done.
Get a ranked result
3
Combines all your choices into a consistent overall ranking.
Simple Settings
Rapid set up in minutes for text or image comparisons
Easy administration through codes, QR code & built in email invitations
Comprehensive and immediate individual and group results
Advanced Settings
Rank items across multiple sections and criteria
Breakdown of results by segments defined by you
Criteria weighting, qualitative explanations, download results data
For individuals
Clarify your own thinking when overwhelmed
Break through analysis paralysis
Make confident decisions with a clear rationale
For groups
Align a team without conflict or politics
Surface real differences of opinion
Reach decisions faster with shared understanding
Before
Endless discussions going nowhere
Conflicting opinions, no resolution
Unclear priorities, shifting goalposts
Decisions driven by the loudest voice
The result
What are our priorities for 2026?
01
Improve staff retention and morale
6 Wins / 0 Losses
100%
02
Enhance service to current customers
5 Wins / 1 Loss
83%
03
Social and environmental footprint
4 Wins / 2 Losses
67%
04
Expand and innovate
3 Wins / 3 Losses
50%
05
Align operational procedures
2 Wins / 4 Losses
33%
After
A clear, ranked order of priorities
Aligned understanding across the team
A defensible result you can explain
Faster decisions with less friction
Intuitive
It's how we make choices naturally
Transparent
A Simple Process Everyone understands
Flexible
Any issue. Any group. Any time.
Accurate
Mathematically rigorous results
Relative judgement is more reliable than absolute judgement. Every time.
01
Eliminates anchoring bias
No numbered scales, no rate-out-of-10. Each comparison is independent. The result reflects genuine relative preference, not where someone started on a scale.
02
Surfaces real consensus
When a group ranks independently, the aggregated result reveals where genuine agreement exists — and crucially, where it doesn't. That's the conversation you need.
03
Removes the loudest voice
Every participant contributes equally. The facilitator sees what the group actually thinks — not what the most senior person in the room said first.
04
Produces a defensible result
The ranked list is mathematically derived from every comparison made. There is no ambiguity about why item A sits above item B. The data speaks for itself.
Works anywhere priorities need to be clear.
01 · Strategy
Strategic Planning
Prioritise initiatives, OKRs, or investment areas. Align a leadership team before the quarter starts — one session, one ranked list, no circular debate.
02 · Product
Product & Roadmap
Rank features and customer requests with your team. Get clarity on what ships next without the loudest PM winning.
03 · People
Hiring & Selection
Evaluate candidates and competency frameworks fairly. Structured, defensible, and over quickly — before group-think sets in.
04 · Creative
Ad & Creative Agencies
Rank campaign concepts and creative directions with clients. Turn subjective taste into a structured, defensible recommendation.
05 · Research
Consumer Research
Rank product concepts, messaging, or brand values with real audiences. More reliable signal than rating scales.
06 · Facilitation
Workshops & Live Sessions
Share a code. Watch priorities emerge on a live screen. Works for five people or five hundred.
The method of paired comparisons yields a scale of psychological values that is more reliable than any other method of scaling.
— Louis Leon Thurstone · Published 1927. Still true.
The science
Based on a century of established research.
The method of paired comparison was formalised by psychologist Louis Leon Thurstone in 1927. He showed that human perception is most accurate when choices are presented in pairs — replicated across psychophysics, economics, and organisational science ever since.
The Analytic Hierarchy Process, developed by Thomas Saaty in the 1970s, extended paired comparison to multi-criteria decision-making. Today, pairwise methods underpin everything from product recommendation algorithms to political polling — and the training of AI models. The core insight — that relative judgement is more reliable than absolute judgement — has proven robust across a century of research.
Why group sessions are particularly powerful.
When multiple participants rank independently, the aggregated result reveals the shape of disagreement — not just the average. A leadership team that disagrees about priorities needs to understand where that disagreement lies, not just what the median view is.
An item that ranks first for half the group and last for the other half produces a very different signal than one that consistently ranks in the middle — even if the average score is similar. The pairwise method surfaces the structure of disagreement explicitly, making it the basis for productive conversation rather than circular debate.
Theory, history, and evidence — the full method
Deep dive →
Contact

Get in touch

Questions, Feedback or Feature Suggestions?