Start From Scratch
A simple ranking with no criteria or scoring framework. Add the options you want to rank and compare them head-to-head.
Pre-filled starting points. Open one and edit anything before you begin.
A simple ranking with no criteria or scoring framework. Add the options you want to rank and compare them head-to-head.
Rank one shared list of options across criteria you define yourself. Add criteria like Impact, Effort, Strategic Fit — whatever matters for your decision.
Rank independent lists across sections you define yourself. Each section gets its own items — think SWOT-style frameworks tailored to your context.
Run a live workshop or conference session. Add questions and rankings. Present them to the room one at a time.
Ask participants a set of questions — multiple choice, ratings, free text and more. No ranking or scoring framework; just collect and compare answers.
Prioritise options by Impact, Confidence and Ease.
Prioritise options across five criteria: Impact, Feasibility, Cost-effectiveness, Equity, and Political Acceptability.
Prioritise options by Value versus Effort to surface quick wins and avoid time sinks.
Prioritise the customer needs, frustrations, and outcomes that matter most. Useful for innovation, product strategy, service improvement, and customer research.
Identify and compare the most significant threats, vulnerabilities, and uncertainties. Useful for governance, strategy, cybersecurity, operational planning, and compliance.
Compare actions, programmes, or initiatives to determine which are most likely to create meaningful impact. Useful for policy, sustainability, social impact, organisational change, and systems improvement.
Identify which assumptions, uncertainties, or hypotheses are most important to test first. Useful for innovation, startups, strategy, and experimentation.
Compare the importance, influence, and engagement needs of different stakeholder groups. Useful for strategy, governance, sustainability, partnerships, and change management.
Compare applicants across key recruitment criteria to support fairer and more structured hiring decisions. Useful for recruitment, promotions, leadership selection, and interview evaluation.
Compare projects and initiatives to determine which should receive the greatest focus and resources. Useful for strategic planning, portfolio management, and operational decision-making.
Compare features and improvements to determine which will create the greatest value for users and the organisation. Useful for product management, roadmap planning, and service development.
Compare suppliers, vendors, or partners across key decision criteria. Useful for procurement, outsourcing, technology purchasing, and partnership evaluation.
Compare proposals, applications, or funding requests in a more structured and transparent way. Useful for grant programmes, accelerators, research funding, and investment review panels.
Compare policy choices, interventions, or strategic responses across multiple decision criteria. Useful for government, public policy, sustainability, and organisational strategy.
Compare software, platforms, or technical solutions across practical and strategic criteria. Useful for software selection, IT planning, procurement, and digital transformation.
Compare potential improvements and identify which changes could most improve service quality and user experience. Useful for operational improvement, customer experience, and organisational development.
Compare learning priorities and identify where development efforts could create the greatest benefit. Useful for workforce development, leadership training, and organisational capability planning.
Compare investment opportunities and determine where resources are most likely to create long-term value. Useful for strategic investment, innovation funding, and portfolio planning.
Compare community issues, challenges, and opportunities to determine where support or intervention is most needed. Useful for local government, nonprofits, healthcare, and community development.
Compare speakers, sessions, or event proposals in a structured and transparent way. Useful for conferences, festivals, workshops, and judging panels.
Compare major life choices across practical, emotional, financial, and long-term considerations. Useful when navigating difficult or uncertain personal decisions with competing priorities.
Compare jobs, career paths, or professional opportunities in a structured and balanced way. Useful for career changes, promotions, or long-term professional planning.
Compare relocation options across lifestyle, opportunity, cost, and personal priorities. Useful for deciding where to live or whether to move.
Compare universities, courses, qualifications, or learning pathways across value, interest, cost, and future opportunity. Useful for students, professionals, and career changers.
Reflect on important relationship decisions across compatibility, trust, values, communication, and long-term fit. Useful for navigating significant personal relationship choices.
Compare lifestyle changes or habits to identify which could create the greatest positive impact. Useful for wellbeing, productivity, balance, and personal growth.
Compare goals, ambitions, or aspirations to decide where to focus time, energy, and resources. Useful when managing multiple competing priorities.
Decide which commitments, activities, or responsibilities deserve the greatest attention. Useful for reducing overwhelm and improving personal effectiveness.
Compare significant purchases across affordability, quality, usefulness, and long-term value. Useful for homes, vehicles, equipment, or other major financial decisions.
Compare financial goals and commitments to determine where resources should be focused first. Useful for budgeting, saving, investing, and debt management.
Compare investment opportunities across risk, return potential, alignment, and time horizon. Useful for personal financial planning and long-term wealth decisions.
Compare wellbeing goals, health changes, or personal improvement options. Useful for making balanced and sustainable lifestyle decisions.
Compare travel plans, experiences, or life opportunities based on meaning, cost, timing, and personal value. Useful for intentional life planning and major experiences.
Compare future planning options across lifestyle, financial security, personal goals, and long-term wellbeing. Useful for retirement and major life transition planning.
Compare important household or life decisions in a more balanced and collaborative way. Useful for schooling, relocation, caregiving, budgeting, and shared priorities.
Compare choices based on how strongly they align with personal values, beliefs, and desired way of living. Useful for reflective decision-making and major life transitions.
Compare options or commitments based on career demands, wellbeing, relationships, and personal fulfilment. Useful for preventing burnout and improving quality of life.
Compare possible future directions, opportunities, or next steps across meaning, practicality, growth, and long-term fulfilment. Useful during periods of uncertainty or transition.
Rank the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing your team or initiative.
Rank the Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal and Environmental factors shaping your team or initiative.
Rank the competitive forces shaping your market — rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, substitutes, and new entrants.
Rank the strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results shaping your strategy.
Rank performance drivers across the four Balanced Scorecard perspectives — Financial, Customer, Internal Process, and Learning & Growth.
Compare difficult decisions involving competing values, risks, and social impacts. Useful for AI governance, sustainability, public policy, healthcare, and organisational ethics.
Identify where small changes could create large systemic effects. Useful for systems thinking, sustainability, organisational transformation, and policy design.
Compare strategies and actions across different possible future conditions. Useful for long-term planning, resilience, uncertainty management, and strategic foresight.
Let a group allocate a shared budget across competing priorities. Each participant distributes a real total (e.g. €100,000,000) across the areas — seeing both the amount and the percentage as they go — and the results show where the group would collectively spend.