Prioritise work

Assumption Prioritisation

Identify which assumptions, uncertainties, or hypotheses are most important to test first. Useful for innovation, startups, strategy, and experimentation. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the framework is

Assumption prioritisation ranks the beliefs a plan rests on, so you test the riskiest ones first instead of the easiest. The template compares assumptions on five criteria: Uncertainty, Business Impact, Testability, Urgency and Cost of Being Wrong. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the result looks like

EXAMPLE
Which assumptions should we test before we build?
Top ranked
Customers will pay monthly
Uncertainty 92% · 1st
Business Impact 63% · 1st
Testability 38% · 3rd
Urgency 75% · 1st
Cost of Being Wrong 50% · 2nd
63%
Weighted win rate

Overall

Options Weighted win rate
01
Customers will pay monthly
Uncertainty 1st · Business Impact 1st · Testability 3rd · Urgency 1st · Cost of Being Wrong 2nd
63%
02
Partners will resell it
Uncertainty 2nd · Business Impact 2nd · Testability 1st · Urgency 3rd · Cost of Being Wrong 1st
52%
03
Setup takes under an hour
Uncertainty 3rd · Business Impact 3rd · Testability 2nd · Urgency 2nd · Cost of Being Wrong 3rd
35%

Overall with the criteria

Rank
Options
Uncertainty
20%
Business Impact
20%
Testability
20%
Urgency
20%
Cost of Being Wrong
20%
Overall
Weighted win rate
01 Customers will pay monthly
92%
1st
63%
1st
38%
3rd
75%
1st
50%
2nd
63%
02 Partners will resell it
42%
2nd
58%
2nd
71%
1st
33%
3rd
54%
1st
52%
03 Setup takes under an hour
17%
3rd
29%
3rd
42%
2nd
42%
2nd
46%
3rd
35%

By the options

01 · Customers will pay monthly 63% weighted win rate
–
Uncertainty
92%
1st of 3 · 22 Wins · 2 Losses
–
Business Impact
63%
1st of 3 · 15 Wins · 9 Losses
–
Testability
38%
3rd of 3 · 9 Wins · 15 Losses
–
Urgency
75%
1st of 3 · 18 Wins · 6 Losses
–
Cost of Being Wrong
50%
2nd of 3 · 12 Wins · 12 Losses
02 · Partners will resell it 52% weighted win rate
–
Uncertainty
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Business Impact
58%
2nd of 3 · 14 Wins · 10 Losses
–
Testability
71%
1st of 3 · 17 Wins · 7 Losses
–
Urgency
33%
3rd of 3 · 8 Wins · 16 Losses
–
Cost of Being Wrong
54%
1st of 3 · 13 Wins · 11 Losses
03 · Setup takes under an hour 35% weighted win rate
–
Uncertainty
17%
3rd of 3 · 4 Wins · 20 Losses
–
Business Impact
29%
3rd of 3 · 7 Wins · 17 Losses
–
Testability
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Urgency
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Cost of Being Wrong
46%
3rd of 3 · 11 Wins · 13 Losses
Scoring Explanations
CRITERIA WEIGHTINGS — The % weighting for each criterion is shown in the table header. Unless this was entered in the setup, the weighting is equal across criteria.
WEIGHTED WIN RATE — Each criterion's result, in the measure they share, averaged using the assigned weightings.

When it earns its place

Use it at the start of a new product, service, venture or strategy, when the plan depends on things nobody has checked yet: that customers will pay, that a partner will sign, that a process will scale.

The trap is testing what is easy to test. The assumptions worth testing first are the ones that are both uncertain and expensive to get wrong, even when they are hard to test.

How to run it with a group

  1. List the assumptions as statements that could be false, such as "Teams will pay monthly for this".
  2. Agree the weights. Uncertainty and Cost of Being Wrong usually matter most.
  3. Participants compare the assumptions two at a time on each criterion. Participants do not need an account to respond. Three to six options keep it manageable: with five options and five criteria, each person makes 50 comparisons.
  4. Read the overall ranking. Design a test for the top two or three, and run the ranking again once the results are in.

Get started