Prioritise work
Project Prioritisation
Compare projects and initiatives to determine which should receive the greatest focus and resources. Useful for strategic planning, portfolio management, and operational decision-making. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.
What the framework is
Project prioritisation compares proposed projects and initiatives to decide which get attention and resources first. The template starts with five criteria: Strategic Value, Potential Impact, Feasibility, Urgency and Resource Efficiency. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.
What the result looks like
Overall
Overall with the criteria
| Rank | Options |
Strategic Value
20%
|
Potential Impact
20%
|
Feasibility
20%
|
Urgency
20%
|
Resource Efficiency
20%
|
Overall
Weighted win rate
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | CRM migration |
63%
|
|||||
| 02 | New website |
52%
|
|||||
| 03 | Warehouse automation |
35%
|
By the options
Scoring Explanations
When it earns its place
Use it in annual planning, portfolio reviews, or whenever more projects are proposed than a team can run. It turns a negotiation between project sponsors into a shared judgement.
The trap is that everything becomes urgent. If every project ranks first on urgency, the criterion has stopped meaning anything. Comparing two at a time forces a choice.
How to run it with a group
- Describe each project in a sentence, with its rough size.
- Agree the weights before anyone compares.
- Participants compare the projects two at a time on each criterion. Participants do not need an account to respond. Three to six options keep it manageable: with five options and five criteria, each person makes 50 comparisons.
- Read the overall ranking, then the ranking per criterion. Fund from the top until capacity runs out, and say clearly which projects are not going ahead.