Prioritise work

Project Prioritisation

Compare projects and initiatives to determine which should receive the greatest focus and resources. Useful for strategic planning, portfolio management, and operational decision-making. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the framework is

Project prioritisation compares proposed projects and initiatives to decide which get attention and resources first. The template starts with five criteria: Strategic Value, Potential Impact, Feasibility, Urgency and Resource Efficiency. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the result looks like

EXAMPLE
Which projects should we resource next year?
Top ranked
CRM migration
Strategic Value 92% · 1st
Potential Impact 63% · 1st
Feasibility 38% · 3rd
Urgency 75% · 1st
Resource Efficiency 50% · 2nd
63%
Weighted win rate

Overall

Options Weighted win rate
01
CRM migration
Strategic Value 1st · Potential Impact 1st · Feasibility 3rd · Urgency 1st · Resource Efficiency 2nd
63%
02
New website
Strategic Value 2nd · Potential Impact 2nd · Feasibility 1st · Urgency 3rd · Resource Efficiency 1st
52%
03
Warehouse automation
Strategic Value 3rd · Potential Impact 3rd · Feasibility 2nd · Urgency 2nd · Resource Efficiency 3rd
35%

Overall with the criteria

Rank
Options
Strategic Value
20%
Potential Impact
20%
Feasibility
20%
Urgency
20%
Resource Efficiency
20%
Overall
Weighted win rate
01 CRM migration
92%
1st
63%
1st
38%
3rd
75%
1st
50%
2nd
63%
02 New website
42%
2nd
58%
2nd
71%
1st
33%
3rd
54%
1st
52%
03 Warehouse automation
17%
3rd
29%
3rd
42%
2nd
42%
2nd
46%
3rd
35%

By the options

01 · CRM migration 63% weighted win rate
–
Strategic Value
92%
1st of 3 · 22 Wins · 2 Losses
–
Potential Impact
63%
1st of 3 · 15 Wins · 9 Losses
–
Feasibility
38%
3rd of 3 · 9 Wins · 15 Losses
–
Urgency
75%
1st of 3 · 18 Wins · 6 Losses
–
Resource Efficiency
50%
2nd of 3 · 12 Wins · 12 Losses
02 · New website 52% weighted win rate
–
Strategic Value
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Potential Impact
58%
2nd of 3 · 14 Wins · 10 Losses
–
Feasibility
71%
1st of 3 · 17 Wins · 7 Losses
–
Urgency
33%
3rd of 3 · 8 Wins · 16 Losses
–
Resource Efficiency
54%
1st of 3 · 13 Wins · 11 Losses
03 · Warehouse automation 35% weighted win rate
–
Strategic Value
17%
3rd of 3 · 4 Wins · 20 Losses
–
Potential Impact
29%
3rd of 3 · 7 Wins · 17 Losses
–
Feasibility
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Urgency
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Resource Efficiency
46%
3rd of 3 · 11 Wins · 13 Losses
Scoring Explanations
CRITERIA WEIGHTINGS — The % weighting for each criterion is shown in the table header. Unless this was entered in the setup, the weighting is equal across criteria.
WEIGHTED WIN RATE — Each criterion's result, in the measure they share, averaged using the assigned weightings.

When it earns its place

Use it in annual planning, portfolio reviews, or whenever more projects are proposed than a team can run. It turns a negotiation between project sponsors into a shared judgement.

The trap is that everything becomes urgent. If every project ranks first on urgency, the criterion has stopped meaning anything. Comparing two at a time forces a choice.

How to run it with a group

  1. Describe each project in a sentence, with its rough size.
  2. Agree the weights before anyone compares.
  3. Participants compare the projects two at a time on each criterion. Participants do not need an account to respond. Three to six options keep it manageable: with five options and five criteria, each person makes 50 comparisons.
  4. Read the overall ranking, then the ranking per criterion. Fund from the top until capacity runs out, and say clearly which projects are not going ahead.

Get started