Prioritise work

Training Needs Assessment

Compare learning priorities and identify where development efforts could create the greatest benefit. Useful for workforce development, leadership training, and organisational capability planning. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the framework is

A training needs assessment compares possible learning priorities to decide where development time and budget will do the most good. The template starts with five criteria: Performance Impact, Urgency, Strategic Importance, Number of Staff Affected and Ease of Delivery. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the result looks like

EXAMPLE
Which training should we offer this year?
Top ranked
Data skills
Performance Impact 92% · 1st
Urgency 63% · 1st
Strategic Importance 38% · 3rd
Number of Staff Affected 75% · 1st
Ease of Delivery 50% · 2nd
63%
Weighted win rate

Overall

Options Weighted win rate
01
Data skills
Performance Impact 1st · Urgency 1st · Strategic Importance 3rd · Number of Staff Affected 1st · Ease of Delivery 2nd
63%
02
Leading hybrid teams
Performance Impact 2nd · Urgency 2nd · Strategic Importance 1st · Number of Staff Affected 3rd · Ease of Delivery 1st
52%
03
Customer conversations
Performance Impact 3rd · Urgency 3rd · Strategic Importance 2nd · Number of Staff Affected 2nd · Ease of Delivery 3rd
35%

Overall with the criteria

Rank
Options
Performance Impact
20%
Urgency
20%
Strategic Importance
20%
Number of Staff Affected
20%
Ease of Delivery
20%
Overall
Weighted win rate
01 Data skills
92%
1st
63%
1st
38%
3rd
75%
1st
50%
2nd
63%
02 Leading hybrid teams
42%
2nd
58%
2nd
71%
1st
33%
3rd
54%
1st
52%
03 Customer conversations
17%
3rd
29%
3rd
42%
2nd
42%
2nd
46%
3rd
35%

By the options

01 · Data skills 63% weighted win rate
–
Performance Impact
92%
1st of 3 · 22 Wins · 2 Losses
–
Urgency
63%
1st of 3 · 15 Wins · 9 Losses
–
Strategic Importance
38%
3rd of 3 · 9 Wins · 15 Losses
–
Number of Staff Affected
75%
1st of 3 · 18 Wins · 6 Losses
–
Ease of Delivery
50%
2nd of 3 · 12 Wins · 12 Losses
02 · Leading hybrid teams 52% weighted win rate
–
Performance Impact
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Urgency
58%
2nd of 3 · 14 Wins · 10 Losses
–
Strategic Importance
71%
1st of 3 · 17 Wins · 7 Losses
–
Number of Staff Affected
33%
3rd of 3 · 8 Wins · 16 Losses
–
Ease of Delivery
54%
1st of 3 · 13 Wins · 11 Losses
03 · Customer conversations 35% weighted win rate
–
Performance Impact
17%
3rd of 3 · 4 Wins · 20 Losses
–
Urgency
29%
3rd of 3 · 7 Wins · 17 Losses
–
Strategic Importance
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Number of Staff Affected
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Ease of Delivery
46%
3rd of 3 · 11 Wins · 13 Losses
Scoring Explanations
CRITERIA WEIGHTINGS — The % weighting for each criterion is shown in the table header. Unless this was entered in the setup, the weighting is equal across criteria.
WEIGHTED WIN RATE — Each criterion's result, in the measure they share, averaged using the assigned weightings.

When it earns its place

Use it when planning a training budget, after appraisals or a skills audit, or when a new system or role changes what people need to know.

The trap is training what is easy to buy. A course catalogue makes some needs look solved. Start from the performance problem, and ask whether training is the answer at all.

How to run it with a group

  1. List the training needs as skills or gaps, not as course titles.
  2. Agree the weights. Decide how much the number of staff affected should count against depth of impact.
  3. Participants compare the needs two at a time on each criterion. Participants do not need an account to respond. Include managers and the staff concerned. Three to six options keep it manageable: with five options and five criteria, each person makes 50 comparisons.
  4. Read the overall ranking, then the ranking per criterion, and plan the top needs first.

Get started