Public sector and community
Community Needs Prioritisation
Compare community issues, challenges, and opportunities to determine where support or intervention is most needed. Useful for local government, nonprofits, healthcare, and community development. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.
What the framework is
Community needs prioritisation compares the issues and needs in a community to decide where support or investment is most needed. The template starts with five criteria: Urgency, Potential Impact, Number of People Affected, Feasibility and Long-Term Importance. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.
What the result looks like
Overall
Overall with the criteria
| Rank | Options |
Urgency
20%
|
Potential Impact
20%
|
Number of People Affected
20%
|
Feasibility
20%
|
Long-Term Importance
20%
|
Overall
Weighted win rate
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Safer crossings |
63%
|
|||||
| 02 | Youth activities |
52%
|
|||||
| 03 | Library opening hours |
35%
|
By the options
Scoring Explanations
When it earns its place
Use it for local plans, needs assessments, a charity's strategy, or a council or health partnership deciding where to focus. It works best when residents and front-line staff take part alongside decision-makers.
The trap is that the loudest needs win. Groups that are hard to reach are easy to under-rank. Bring in evidence and the people affected, not only those who usually attend.
How to run it with a group
- List each need in plain language, as residents would describe it.
- Agree the weights. Decide how much the number of people affected should count against urgency.
- Send the link and give people a week or two. Participants do not need an account to respond. Reach out beyond the usual channels.
- Read the overall ranking, then the ranking per criterion. Publish the result, and say what will happen next.