Personal decisions

Financial Priority Assessment

Compare financial goals and commitments to determine where resources should be focused first. Useful for budgeting, saving, investing, and debt management. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the framework is

Financial priority assessment compares your financial goals and commitments, such as paying off debt, building savings or a deposit, to decide where money should go first. The template starts with five criteria: Long-Term Benefit, Urgency, Risk Reduction, Personal Importance and Feasibility. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the result looks like

EXAMPLE
Which financial goal comes first?
Top ranked
Emergency fund
Long-Term Benefit 92% · 1st
Urgency 63% · 1st
Risk Reduction 38% · 3rd
Personal Importance 75% · 1st
Feasibility 50% · 2nd
63%
Weighted win rate

Overall

Options Weighted win rate
01
Emergency fund
Long-Term Benefit 1st · Urgency 1st · Risk Reduction 3rd · Personal Importance 1st · Feasibility 2nd
63%
02
Pay off credit card
Long-Term Benefit 2nd · Urgency 2nd · Risk Reduction 1st · Personal Importance 3rd · Feasibility 1st
52%
03
Pension top-up
Long-Term Benefit 3rd · Urgency 3rd · Risk Reduction 2nd · Personal Importance 2nd · Feasibility 3rd
35%

Overall with the criteria

Rank
Options
Long-Term Benefit
20%
Urgency
20%
Risk Reduction
20%
Personal Importance
20%
Feasibility
20%
Overall
Weighted win rate
01 Emergency fund
92%
1st
63%
1st
38%
3rd
75%
1st
50%
2nd
63%
02 Pay off credit card
42%
2nd
58%
2nd
71%
1st
33%
3rd
54%
1st
52%
03 Pension top-up
17%
3rd
29%
3rd
42%
2nd
42%
2nd
46%
3rd
35%

By the options

01 · Emergency fund 63% weighted win rate
–
Long-Term Benefit
92%
1st of 3 · 22 Wins · 2 Losses
–
Urgency
63%
1st of 3 · 15 Wins · 9 Losses
–
Risk Reduction
38%
3rd of 3 · 9 Wins · 15 Losses
–
Personal Importance
75%
1st of 3 · 18 Wins · 6 Losses
–
Feasibility
50%
2nd of 3 · 12 Wins · 12 Losses
02 · Pay off credit card 52% weighted win rate
–
Long-Term Benefit
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Urgency
58%
2nd of 3 · 14 Wins · 10 Losses
–
Risk Reduction
71%
1st of 3 · 17 Wins · 7 Losses
–
Personal Importance
33%
3rd of 3 · 8 Wins · 16 Losses
–
Feasibility
54%
1st of 3 · 13 Wins · 11 Losses
03 · Pension top-up 35% weighted win rate
–
Long-Term Benefit
17%
3rd of 3 · 4 Wins · 20 Losses
–
Urgency
29%
3rd of 3 · 7 Wins · 17 Losses
–
Risk Reduction
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Personal Importance
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Feasibility
46%
3rd of 3 · 11 Wins · 13 Losses
Scoring Explanations
CRITERIA WEIGHTINGS — The % weighting for each criterion is shown in the table header. Unless this was entered in the setup, the weighting is equal across criteria.
WEIGHTED WIN RATE — Each criterion's result, in the measure they share, averaged using the assigned weightings.

When it earns its place

Use it when you are deciding how to split a limited monthly budget or a lump sum between competing goals.

How to run it with a group

  1. List your financial goals and commitments, with rough amounts.
  2. Decide how much each criterion counts for you.
  3. Compare the priorities two at a time on each criterion. If you share finances, send your partner the link too. Participants do not need an account to respond.
  4. Fund from the top of the ranking.

Get started