Personal decisions

Personal Goal Prioritisation

Compare goals, ambitions, or aspirations to decide where to focus time, energy, and resources. Useful when managing multiple competing priorities. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the framework is

Personal goal prioritisation compares your goals and ambitions to decide where to put your time and energy now. The template starts with five criteria: Personal Importance, Long-Term Benefit, Feasibility, Urgency and Alignment with Values. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the result looks like

EXAMPLE
Which goals deserve my focus this year?
Top ranked
Run a half marathon
Personal Importance 92% · 1st
Long-Term Benefit 63% · 1st
Feasibility 38% · 3rd
Urgency 75% · 1st
Alignment with Values 50% · 2nd
63%
Weighted win rate

Overall

Options Weighted win rate
01
Run a half marathon
Personal Importance 1st · Long-Term Benefit 1st · Feasibility 3rd · Urgency 1st · Alignment with Values 2nd
63%
02
Learn Spanish
Personal Importance 2nd · Long-Term Benefit 2nd · Feasibility 1st · Urgency 3rd · Alignment with Values 1st
52%
03
Save for a deposit
Personal Importance 3rd · Long-Term Benefit 3rd · Feasibility 2nd · Urgency 2nd · Alignment with Values 3rd
35%

Overall with the criteria

Rank
Options
Personal Importance
20%
Long-Term Benefit
20%
Feasibility
20%
Urgency
20%
Alignment with Values
20%
Overall
Weighted win rate
01 Run a half marathon
92%
1st
63%
1st
38%
3rd
75%
1st
50%
2nd
63%
02 Learn Spanish
42%
2nd
58%
2nd
71%
1st
33%
3rd
54%
1st
52%
03 Save for a deposit
17%
3rd
29%
3rd
42%
2nd
42%
2nd
46%
3rd
35%

By the options

01 · Run a half marathon 63% weighted win rate
–
Personal Importance
92%
1st of 3 · 22 Wins · 2 Losses
–
Long-Term Benefit
63%
1st of 3 · 15 Wins · 9 Losses
–
Feasibility
38%
3rd of 3 · 9 Wins · 15 Losses
–
Urgency
75%
1st of 3 · 18 Wins · 6 Losses
–
Alignment with Values
50%
2nd of 3 · 12 Wins · 12 Losses
02 · Learn Spanish 52% weighted win rate
–
Personal Importance
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Long-Term Benefit
58%
2nd of 3 · 14 Wins · 10 Losses
–
Feasibility
71%
1st of 3 · 17 Wins · 7 Losses
–
Urgency
33%
3rd of 3 · 8 Wins · 16 Losses
–
Alignment with Values
54%
1st of 3 · 13 Wins · 11 Losses
03 · Save for a deposit 35% weighted win rate
–
Personal Importance
17%
3rd of 3 · 4 Wins · 20 Losses
–
Long-Term Benefit
29%
3rd of 3 · 7 Wins · 17 Losses
–
Feasibility
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Urgency
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Alignment with Values
46%
3rd of 3 · 11 Wins · 13 Losses
Scoring Explanations
CRITERIA WEIGHTINGS — The % weighting for each criterion is shown in the table header. Unless this was entered in the setup, the weighting is equal across criteria.
WEIGHTED WIN RATE — Each criterion's result, in the measure they share, averaged using the assigned weightings.

When it earns its place

Use it at the start of a year, after a big change, or when too many goals are competing and none is moving.

The trap is treating every goal as equally urgent. Comparing goals two at a time makes you choose, and a short list of goals you act on beats a long list you don't.

How to run it with a group

  1. List your goals, each as an outcome you could recognise, such as "run a 10k".
  2. Decide how much each criterion counts for you.
  3. Compare the goals two at a time on each criterion.
  4. Pick the top two or three to focus on now, and park the rest deliberately rather than dropping them.

Get started