Prioritise work
Service Improvement Prioritisation
Compare potential improvements and identify which changes could most improve service quality and user experience. Useful for operational improvement, customer experience, and organisational development. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.
What the framework is
Service improvement prioritisation compares possible changes to a service to find the ones that would most improve it for its users. The template starts with five criteria: Customer Impact, Ease of Implementation, Cost Effectiveness, Strategic Importance and Urgency. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.
What the result looks like
Overall
Overall with the criteria
| Rank | Options |
Customer Impact
20%
|
Ease of Implementation
20%
|
Cost Effectiveness
20%
|
Strategic Importance
20%
|
Urgency
20%
|
Overall
Weighted win rate
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Online booking |
63%
|
|||||
| 02 | Shorter phone queues |
52%
|
|||||
| 03 | Clearer letters |
35%
|
By the options
Scoring Explanations
When it earns its place
Use it after a customer survey, a complaints review, a service redesign workshop or a staff suggestion scheme, when there are more ideas than capacity to deliver them.
The trap is fixing what staff notice rather than what users feel. Bring in evidence from users, and if you can, people who use the service, so customer impact is judged from their side.
How to run it with a group
- List each improvement as a specific change, such as "text appointment reminders a day before".
- Agree the weights for this service.
- Participants compare the improvements two at a time on each criterion. Participants do not need an account to respond. Three to six options keep it manageable: with five options and five criteria, each person makes 50 comparisons.
- Read the overall ranking, then the ranking per criterion. Quick wins rank high on ease and impact; start with one or two of those while the bigger changes are planned.