Prioritise work

Service Improvement Prioritisation

Compare potential improvements and identify which changes could most improve service quality and user experience. Useful for operational improvement, customer experience, and organisational development. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the framework is

Service improvement prioritisation compares possible changes to a service to find the ones that would most improve it for its users. The template starts with five criteria: Customer Impact, Ease of Implementation, Cost Effectiveness, Strategic Importance and Urgency. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the result looks like

EXAMPLE
Which improvements should we make first?
Top ranked
Online booking
Customer Impact 92% · 1st
Ease of Implementation 63% · 1st
Cost Effectiveness 38% · 3rd
Strategic Importance 75% · 1st
Urgency 50% · 2nd
63%
Weighted win rate

Overall

Options Weighted win rate
01
Online booking
Customer Impact 1st · Ease of Implementation 1st · Cost Effectiveness 3rd · Strategic Importance 1st · Urgency 2nd
63%
02
Shorter phone queues
Customer Impact 2nd · Ease of Implementation 2nd · Cost Effectiveness 1st · Strategic Importance 3rd · Urgency 1st
52%
03
Clearer letters
Customer Impact 3rd · Ease of Implementation 3rd · Cost Effectiveness 2nd · Strategic Importance 2nd · Urgency 3rd
35%

Overall with the criteria

Rank
Options
Customer Impact
20%
Ease of Implementation
20%
Cost Effectiveness
20%
Strategic Importance
20%
Urgency
20%
Overall
Weighted win rate
01 Online booking
92%
1st
63%
1st
38%
3rd
75%
1st
50%
2nd
63%
02 Shorter phone queues
42%
2nd
58%
2nd
71%
1st
33%
3rd
54%
1st
52%
03 Clearer letters
17%
3rd
29%
3rd
42%
2nd
42%
2nd
46%
3rd
35%

By the options

01 · Online booking 63% weighted win rate
–
Customer Impact
92%
1st of 3 · 22 Wins · 2 Losses
–
Ease of Implementation
63%
1st of 3 · 15 Wins · 9 Losses
–
Cost Effectiveness
38%
3rd of 3 · 9 Wins · 15 Losses
–
Strategic Importance
75%
1st of 3 · 18 Wins · 6 Losses
–
Urgency
50%
2nd of 3 · 12 Wins · 12 Losses
02 · Shorter phone queues 52% weighted win rate
–
Customer Impact
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Ease of Implementation
58%
2nd of 3 · 14 Wins · 10 Losses
–
Cost Effectiveness
71%
1st of 3 · 17 Wins · 7 Losses
–
Strategic Importance
33%
3rd of 3 · 8 Wins · 16 Losses
–
Urgency
54%
1st of 3 · 13 Wins · 11 Losses
03 · Clearer letters 35% weighted win rate
–
Customer Impact
17%
3rd of 3 · 4 Wins · 20 Losses
–
Ease of Implementation
29%
3rd of 3 · 7 Wins · 17 Losses
–
Cost Effectiveness
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Strategic Importance
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Urgency
46%
3rd of 3 · 11 Wins · 13 Losses
Scoring Explanations
CRITERIA WEIGHTINGS — The % weighting for each criterion is shown in the table header. Unless this was entered in the setup, the weighting is equal across criteria.
WEIGHTED WIN RATE — Each criterion's result, in the measure they share, averaged using the assigned weightings.

When it earns its place

Use it after a customer survey, a complaints review, a service redesign workshop or a staff suggestion scheme, when there are more ideas than capacity to deliver them.

The trap is fixing what staff notice rather than what users feel. Bring in evidence from users, and if you can, people who use the service, so customer impact is judged from their side.

How to run it with a group

  1. List each improvement as a specific change, such as "text appointment reminders a day before".
  2. Agree the weights for this service.
  3. Participants compare the improvements two at a time on each criterion. Participants do not need an account to respond. Three to six options keep it manageable: with five options and five criteria, each person makes 50 comparisons.
  4. Read the overall ranking, then the ranking per criterion. Quick wins rank high on ease and impact; start with one or two of those while the bigger changes are planned.

Get started