Personal decisions

Time & Focus Prioritisation

Decide which commitments, activities, or responsibilities deserve the greatest attention. Useful for reducing overwhelm and improving personal effectiveness. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the framework is

Time and focus prioritisation compares your commitments and activities to decide which deserve your attention, and which to reduce or stop. The template starts with five criteria: Importance, Urgency, Long-Term Value, Energy Impact and Alignment with Goals. The criteria can be changed, added to and weighted.

What the result looks like

EXAMPLE
Where should my time go?
Top ranked
Side project
Importance 92% · 1st
Urgency 63% · 1st
Long-Term Value 38% · 3rd
Energy Impact 75% · 1st
Alignment with Goals 50% · 2nd
63%
Weighted win rate

Overall

Options Weighted win rate
01
Side project
Importance 1st · Urgency 1st · Long-Term Value 3rd · Energy Impact 1st · Alignment with Goals 2nd
63%
02
Volunteering
Importance 2nd · Urgency 2nd · Long-Term Value 1st · Energy Impact 3rd · Alignment with Goals 1st
52%
03
Evening course
Importance 3rd · Urgency 3rd · Long-Term Value 2nd · Energy Impact 2nd · Alignment with Goals 3rd
35%

Overall with the criteria

Rank
Options
Importance
20%
Urgency
20%
Long-Term Value
20%
Energy Impact
20%
Alignment with Goals
20%
Overall
Weighted win rate
01 Side project
92%
1st
63%
1st
38%
3rd
75%
1st
50%
2nd
63%
02 Volunteering
42%
2nd
58%
2nd
71%
1st
33%
3rd
54%
1st
52%
03 Evening course
17%
3rd
29%
3rd
42%
2nd
42%
2nd
46%
3rd
35%

By the options

01 · Side project 63% weighted win rate
–
Importance
92%
1st of 3 · 22 Wins · 2 Losses
–
Urgency
63%
1st of 3 · 15 Wins · 9 Losses
–
Long-Term Value
38%
3rd of 3 · 9 Wins · 15 Losses
–
Energy Impact
75%
1st of 3 · 18 Wins · 6 Losses
–
Alignment with Goals
50%
2nd of 3 · 12 Wins · 12 Losses
02 · Volunteering 52% weighted win rate
–
Importance
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Urgency
58%
2nd of 3 · 14 Wins · 10 Losses
–
Long-Term Value
71%
1st of 3 · 17 Wins · 7 Losses
–
Energy Impact
33%
3rd of 3 · 8 Wins · 16 Losses
–
Alignment with Goals
54%
1st of 3 · 13 Wins · 11 Losses
03 · Evening course 35% weighted win rate
–
Importance
17%
3rd of 3 · 4 Wins · 20 Losses
–
Urgency
29%
3rd of 3 · 7 Wins · 17 Losses
–
Long-Term Value
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Energy Impact
42%
2nd of 3 · 10 Wins · 14 Losses
–
Alignment with Goals
46%
3rd of 3 · 11 Wins · 13 Losses
Scoring Explanations
CRITERIA WEIGHTINGS — The % weighting for each criterion is shown in the table header. Unless this was entered in the setup, the weighting is equal across criteria.
WEIGHTED WIN RATE — Each criterion's result, in the measure they share, averaged using the assigned weightings.

When it earns its place

Use it when you are overstretched and everything feels necessary. It is a structured version of asking "if I could only keep three, which would they be?".

The trap is urgency. Urgent tasks crowd out important ones, the distinction from Eisenhower's 1954 remark that Stephen Covey later popularised as a four-box matrix (1989). Comparing on importance and urgency separately shows which is which.

How to run it with a group

  1. List your current commitments and activities, including the ones you would like to drop.
  2. Decide how much each criterion counts for you.
  3. Compare the activities two at a time on each criterion.
  4. Protect time for the top few. For those at the bottom, decide whether to reduce, delegate or stop them.

Get started